What does a checked model plan tell me?
For the sphere example, the checks establish consistency between its saved English instructions, recorded model actions, construction references and modeled finishing sequence. Another result needs its own check record. Passing these checks does not mean a person has crocheted the project or resolved every requirement in the original draft.
These checks help identify mismatches and missing information. They do not establish all real-world properties of yarn, tension, stuffing or physical hand movements.
Which checks were run on the sphere plan?
The public sphere example records a synthetic model input and 504 construction outputs. Its latest local audit was on . The checks below describe that saved version. Other results need their own checking record.
| Check | Pass condition | Example of a mismatch |
|---|---|---|
| Saved English actions | The saved English text matches a freshly rebuilt document. Reading it back produces the same actions, material labels, targets and outputs as the model plan. | A changed target, omitted action or reordered instruction no longer matches the model. |
| Construction references | The displayed step, its output numbers and its model coordinates match the same-version checked construction. | A displayed point number refers to a different output, or a step comes from a stale version. |
| Finishing order in the model | Replaying the recorded model actions accounts for the proposed filling opening, ending the making yarn, terminal cap connections and securing the needle yarn. | A changed or missing finishing action no longer matches the modeled sequence. Passing does not show that a person's hands can perform it. |
| Input and file version | The source input, saved settings and required files are bound to the audit. The recorded source construction validation and parsing passed. | A missing file, changed document, mismatched input or missing validation result prevents approval. |
The actual sphere instruction says “Work sc, sc, sc into stitch 2; number the new stitches 7, 8, 9.” Changing it to work into stitch 3 would no longer match this saved model. This is a consistency condition, not an observed user failure or a claim that the correct text has been physically tested.
See the real instruction and numbered construction locations, then compare the saved English plan with its checking record.
This scope does not certify general crochet arithmetic, material quantities, suitable stuffing, tension, physical access, finished appearance or measured size. It does not check arbitrary patterns supplied by other tools.
Why are there separate result statuses?
| Evidence | What it describes |
|---|---|
| Target shape | The proposed form to review against your reference. |
| Complete model plan | A plan that passed the specific checks recorded for that version; the sphere scope is listed above. |
| English consistency | Whether the saved English instructions match the checked model plan. |
| Source readiness | Whether the original source draft still has unresolved requirements. |
| Test-crocheted | Whether someone physically followed that version with recorded materials. |
A complete derived model plan does not automatically resolve an incomplete source draft. It also does not turn a result into a test-crocheted pattern.
For the sphere, the original source still reports unresolved stuffing timing, the unit to be filled, and source stitch arithmetic. The derived plan proposes a filling point and finishing sequence, but it does not mark those original source requirements as resolved.
Have the current outputs been physically tested?
Current outputs have not been physically test-crocheted. The public sphere example records model and English checks, while physical execution and scale accuracy remain unverified.
Representative physical testing is part of the project's validation plan. A useful record needs the instruction version, materials, measurements, making difficulties, revisions and actual result. Such a record applies to the tested conditions.
How can I check the public example myself?
Open the actual sphere example, inspect its views, read its English model plan, and compare the statuses in its downloadable verification record. The record identifies its synthetic input and states that it is not a photo-to-model test.
Illustrative artwork is labeled separately. An attractive illustration does not provide a test record.